Inventor · Chester, GB

Bryan Griffiths

34Patents
17h-index
42Co-inventors
81Inventor score

Filing activity: Nov 22, 1994 → Jun 28, 2021

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US7759537B2 Multi layered wound dressing Human Necessities 245 Active
US8034037B2 Vacuum wound dressing Human Necessities 140 Active
USD484601S1 Wound dressing General 115 Expired
USD484602S1 Wound dressing General 108 Expired
US9381283B2 Vacuum wound dressing Human Necessities 94 Active
USD480144S1 Wound dressing General 86 Expired
US6348423B1 Multilayered wound dressing Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 83 Expired
US8398685B2 Transbuccal plate holding cannula Human Necessities 75 Active
US5980930A Fibres Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 73 Expired
US6552244B1 Multi-layered wound dressing Human Necessities 61 Expired
US7473255B2 Transbuccal plate holding cannula Human Necessities 58 Active
US7803980B2 Multi-layered wound dressing Human Necessities 56 Expired
US9549819B1 Preformed cranial implant Human Necessities 38 Active
US9750552B2 Expandable fixation assemblies Human Necessities 34 Active
US6688693B2 Seat back assembly Human Necessities 34 Expired
US5914124A Alginate fibre, process for the preparation thereof and use Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 31 Expired
US7887587B2 Soft tissue spacer Human Necessities 25 Active
US8974508B2 Expandable fixation assemblies Human Necessities 9 Active
US8795277B2 Reconstruction device Human Necessities 9 Active
US8152834B2 Forceps and system using same Human Necessities 8 Active
US7690282B2 Screw-retaining screwdriver Performing Operations; Transporting 8 Active
US6458460B1 Wound dressing Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 7 Expired
US5690955A Sustained release alginate fibre and process for the preparation thereof Human Necessities 6 Expired
US5976439A Alginate ropes, method of preparation and use Textiles; Paper 3 Expired
US8691266B2 Wound dressing material Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 3 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.