Inventor · Auckland, NZ

Dallas James

34Patents
7h-index
12Co-inventors
62Inventor score

Filing activity: Sep 22, 2004 → Feb 23, 2022

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US7699293B2 Guardrail Fixed Constructions 17 Expired
US8246013B2 Cable guardrail system and hanger Fixed Constructions 14 Active
US7878485B2 Roadway guardrail system Fixed Constructions 11 Active
US8491216B2 Vehicle crash attenuator apparatus Fixed Constructions 11 Active
US7926790B2 Impact slider for guardrail Fixed Constructions 10 Active
US8353499B2 Roadway guardrail system Fixed Constructions 10 Active
US8864108B2 Barrier section connection system Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 7 Active
US8424849B2 Guardrail Fixed Constructions 7 Active
US8757597B2 Posts Fixed Constructions 7 Active
US8596617B2 Impact energy dissipation system Fixed Constructions 6 Active
US9453312B2 Energy absorption devices Fixed Constructions 5 Active
US9822502B2 Energy absorbing apparatus Fixed Constructions 4 Active
US8177194B2 Frangible post for guardrail Fixed Constructions 3 Active
US8915040B2 Plastic barriers Fixed Constructions 3 Active
US9863106B2 Roadway guardrail system Fixed Constructions 3 Active
US8978225B2 Frangible posts Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 3 Active
US7837415B2 Retaining wall and blocks for the formation thereof Fixed Constructions 3 Active
US10587662B2 Secure, multi-lingual, flexible access system and method Electricity 2 Active
US9243375B2 Posts Fixed Constructions 2 Active
US8807536B2 Roadway guardrail system Fixed Constructions 1 Active
US9127424B2 Connecting devices Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 1 Active
US9297130B2 Cable-barriers Fixed Constructions 1 Active
US8915486B2 Releaseable anchor cables for cable barriers that release upon certain load conditions upon the cable barrier Mechanical Engineering; Lighting; Heating 1 Active
US8915487B2 Barriers Fixed Constructions 1 Active
US10190274B2 Connecting devices Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 1 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.