Inventor · Sandy, GB

Daniel Swallow

19Patents
8h-index
30Co-inventors
68Inventor score

Filing activity: Jul 6, 2009 → Feb 12, 2019

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US8540952B2 Catalyzed substrate and exhaust system for internal combustion engine Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 26 Active
US9636634B2 Diesel oxidation catalyst and exhaust system Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 19 Active
US9140167B2 Oxidation catalyst for a lean burn internal combustion engine Performing Operations; Transporting 12 Active
US8795617B2 Catalyzed substrate and exhaust system for internal combustion engine Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 11 Active
US9611773B2 Zoned catalysed substrate monolith Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 11 Active
US9114385B2 NOx absorber catalyst Mechanical Engineering; Lighting; Heating 11 Active
US9828896B2 Exhaust system with a modified lean NOx trap Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 8 Active
US8641993B2 NOx absorber catalysts Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 8 Active
US9486791B2 NOx trap Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 6 Active
US9527031B2 Exhaust system for a lean burn IC engine Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 6 Active
US8756926B2 Exhaust system for a lean burn ic engine Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 4 Active
US10213768B2 NOx trap Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 4 Active
US10151227B2 Nitrogen oxides (NOx) storage catalyst Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 2 Active
US10532344B2 NOx trap Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 2 Active
US11358127B2 NOx adsorber catalyst Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 2 Active
US10539055B2 Exhaust system with a modified lean NOx trap Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active
US11365660B2 NOx adsorber catalyst Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active
US9574474B2 Control of emissions Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active
US10119445B2 Exhaust system with a modified lean NOx trap Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.