Inventor · North Charleston, SC, US

David Drew Morris

20Patents
11h-index
7Co-inventors
68Inventor score

Filing activity: Oct 17, 1990 → Jan 16, 2019

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US6304698A Conduit insert for optical fiber cable Electricity 62 Expired
US6718100B2 Fire resistant conduit insert for optical fiber cable Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 37 Expired
US6876797B2 Fire resistant conduit insert for optical fiber cable Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 26 Expired
US7085458B2 Fire resistant conduit insert for optical fiber cable Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 22 Expired
USD334717S Chalk line marker General 22 Expired
US6421485B2 Conduit insert for optical fiber cable Electricity 22 Expired
US7799997B2 Innerduct structure having increased flexibility Physics 21 Active
US7085455B2 Conduit insert for optical fiber cable Electricity 19 Expired
US7754971B2 Detectable pull tape Electricity 18 Active
US7319802B2 Conduit insert for optical fiber cable Electricity 16 Active
US7174074B2 Conduit insert for optical fiber cable Electricity 14 Active
US6671440B2 Conduit insert for optical fiber cable Electricity 10 Expired
US9362725B2 Electromagnetic shielded sleeve Textiles; Paper 10 Active
US6383959B1 Fabric for diverting air flow in an automotive air conditioning system Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 4 Expired
US10870931B2 Woven textile fabric and innerduct having multiple-inserted filling yarns Textiles; Paper 3 Active
US9314981B2 Divided conduit extrusion die and method with joining features Performing Operations; Transporting 1 Active
US9242419B2 Divided conduit extrusion die and method Performing Operations; Transporting 1 Active
US10947078B2 Winding system for elongated elements Performing Operations; Transporting 0 Active
US10239248B2 Fabric and die design for divided conduit Performing Operations; Transporting 0 Active
US10594126B2 Process for forming a divided conduit Performing Operations; Transporting 0 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.