Inventor · Charbonnières-les-Bains, FR

Jacques Menault

11Patents
4h-index
6Co-inventors
45Inventor score

Filing activity: Jul 14, 1977 → May 23, 1986

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US4297412A Two-component mixed acrylic fibres wherein acrylic components have different amounts of non-ionizable plasticizing comonomer Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 49 Expired
US4454091A Solutions, which can be shaped, from mixtures of cellulose and polyvinyl chloride, and shaped articles resulting therefrom and the process for their manufacture Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 32 Expired
US4377648A Cellulose-polyacrylonitrile-DMSO-formaldehyde solutions, articles, and methods of making same Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 6 Expired
US4529768A Solutions based on polyvinyl chloride, the process for their preparation and yarns and fibres thus obtained Chemistry; Metallurgy 4 Expired
US4129451A Spinnable cellulose solution and process for making same Textiles; Paper 3 Expired
US4409289A Cellulose-acrylonitrile polymer solutions, articles, and methods of making same Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 1 Expired
US4707319A Process for production of yarns and fibers with good properties, based on atactic polyvinyl chloride Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 1 Expired
US4681594A Process for disperse dyeing dry-spun atactic polyvinyl chloride-based filaments and fibres before drawing Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 1 Expired
US4681595A Process for disperse dyeing dry-spun atactic polyvinyl chloride-based filaments and fibres after drawing the wet tow Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Expired
US4363895A Solutions, which can be shaped, from mixtures of cellulose and polyamide-imide, and shaped articles obtained Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Expired
US4780368A Yarns and fibers with good properties, based on a mixture of polyvinyl chloride and postchlorinated polyvinyl chloride Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Expired

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.