James Webber
17Patents
4h-index
13Co-inventors
53Inventor score
Filing activity: Mar 2, 2012 → Jul 13, 2023
Most-cited inventions
| Patent | Title | Area | Cited by | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9477779B2 | Graph database devices and methods for partitioning graphs | Physics | 21 | Active |
| US9362071B2 | Gas density monitoring system | Electricity | 4 | Active |
| US9925946B2 | Low mass passenger airbag | Performing Operations; Transporting | 4 | Active |
| US8814201B2 | Knee airbag having increased package width | Performing Operations; Transporting | 4 | Active |
| US8783711B2 | Low mass passenger airbag design | Performing Operations; Transporting | 3 | Active |
| US10112568B2 | Low mass passenger airbag | Performing Operations; Transporting | 1 | Active |
| US11481385B1 | Graph database system to safely store data at high volume and scale | Physics | 1 | Active |
| US11475065B2 | Pre-emptive graph search for guided natural language interactions with connected data systems | Physics | 1 | Active |
| US11544251B1 | Database system with transactional commit protocol based on safe conjunction of majorities | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US8931802B2 | Variable volume airbag | Performing Operations; Transporting | 0 | Active |
| US12164571B2 | Pre-emptive graph search for guided natural language interactions with connected data systems | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US11960478B2 | Database system with transactional commit protocol based on safe conjunction of majorities | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US9672266B2 | Method and apparatus for ensuring consistent outcomes in updates to distributed databases | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US12032582B2 | Bi-gram cardinality estimation in a graph database | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US11544280B2 | Bi-gram cardinality estimation in a graph database | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US11748362B2 | Bi-gram cardinality estimation in a graph database | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US8687288B2 | Driver vision field extender | Physics | 0 | Active |
Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.