Inventor · Greensburg, PA, US

Michael R. McCormick

15Patents
7h-index
14Co-inventors
63Inventor score

Filing activity: May 25, 2001 → Jan 29, 2021

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US6582164B1 Roller twist drill Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 67 Expired
US7360974B2 Rotary cutting tool, such as a drill, comprising an exchangeable cutting insert, and an exchangeable cutting insert Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 32 Expired
US6471453B1 Balancing assembly for a rotating member Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 21 Expired
US7832967B2 Rotary cutting tool, such as a drill, comprising an exchangeable cutting insert, and an exchangeable cutting insert Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 17 Active
US7669308B2 Method of assembling a collet and lock nut assembly Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 12 Active
US8366358B2 Rotary cutting tool, such as a drill, comprising an exchangeable cutting insert, and an exchangeable cutting insert Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 11 Active
US8807888B2 Rotary cutting tool, such as a drill, comprising an exchangeable cutting insert, and an exchangeable cutting insert Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 10 Active
US7306238B2 Collet and lock nut Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 6 Expired
US9468977B2 Cylindrical grinding process and as-ground part resulting from such process Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 5 Active
US9630258B2 Tool holder assembly with dampening elements Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 3 Active
US8257003B2 Side actuated collet lock mechanism Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 3 Active
US9849520B2 Inverted piloted collet chuck and applications thereof Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 1 Active
US7261302B2 Collet and lock nut assembly Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 1 Expired
US9033424B2 Wear resistant cutting tool Fixed Constructions 0 Active
US12288987B2 Demand response management for a battery charging system Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.