Inventor · Cambridge, MA, US

Robert Brik

18Patents
4h-index
30Co-inventors
56Inventor score

Filing activity: Mar 14, 2012 → Nov 15, 2023

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US9427226B2 Laparoscopic suturing instrument with rack drive Human Necessities 71 Active
US9277916B2 Laparoscopic suturing instrument with manual drive Human Necessities 14 Active
US9907911B2 Portable drug mixing and delivery device and associated methods Human Necessities 10 Active
US11166743B2 Devices and methods for cosmetic skin resurfacing Human Necessities 4 Active
US11849932B2 Sensor enabled retractor for robotic surgery Human Necessities 1 Active
US10350364B2 Portable Drug Mixing and Delivery Device and Associated Methods Human Necessities 1 Active
US11925426B2 Surgical robot with anti-skive feature Human Necessities 0 Active
US10537680B2 Portable drug mixing and delivery device and associated methods Human Necessities 0 Active
US12239822B2 Portable drug mixing and delivery device and associated methods Human Necessities 0 Active
US10300198B2 Portable drug mixing and delivery device and associated methods Human Necessities 0 Active
US9925335B2 Portable drug mixing and delivery device and associated methods Human Necessities 0 Active
US9950115B2 Portable drug mixing and delivery device and associated methods Human Necessities 0 Active
US12336699B2 Sensor enabled retractor for robotic surgery Human Necessities 0 Active
US12251168B2 Systems, methods, and devices for localized tracking of a vertebral body or other anatomic structure Human Necessities 0 Active
US11944391B2 Systems and methods for using surgical robots with navigation arrays Human Necessities 0 Active
US10300199B2 Portable drug mixing and delivery device and associated methods Human Necessities 0 Active
US11007320B2 Portable drug mixing and delivery device and associated methods Human Necessities 0 Active
US11806098B2 Surgical robotic systems including a sterile connector and related methods Electricity 0 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.