Shigeki Takenouchi
18Patents
7h-index
23Co-inventors
66Inventor score
Filing activity: Dec 26, 1985 → Apr 2, 2009
Most-cited inventions
| Patent | Title | Area | Cited by | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4898799A | Photoreceptor | Physics | 70 | Expired |
| US5798200A | Electrophotographic image forming method | Physics | 26 | Expired |
| US5633703A | Image forming apparatus having transfer roller and separation brush | Physics | 25 | Expired |
| US7127201B2 | Image forming apparatus and image forming method | Physics | 14 | Expired |
| US5689771A | Color image forming apparatus having bias controller for cleaning transfer roller | Physics | 13 | Expired |
| US4925757A | Electrophotographic photoreceptor for negative electrification | Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies | 11 | Expired |
| US7022450B2 | Image forming method and image forming apparatus | Physics | 9 | Expired |
| US4673629A | Photoreceptor having amorphous silicon layers | Physics | 7 | Expired |
| US7692846B2 | Image display device | Physics | 3 | Active |
| US7285366B2 | Organic photoreceptor, an image forming method, an image forming apparatus and a process cartridge | Physics | 2 | Expired |
| US7220527B2 | Image forming apparatus and an image forming method | Physics | 1 | Expired |
| US5273852A | Electrophotographic photoreceptor employing polysilane-type carrier transfer polymeric material | Physics | 1 | Expired |
| US7839562B2 | White particles for image display device | Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies | 1 | Active |
| US7374853B2 | Organic photoreceptor and an image forming method using the same | Physics | 1 | Expired |
| US7830593B2 | Image display device | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US8194032B2 | Image display medium, preparation method thereof | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US7085518B2 | Adhesive material for processing device, process cartridge, and electrophotographic image forming apparatus | Physics | 0 | Expired |
| US7813031B2 | Image display device | Physics | 0 | Active |
Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.