Inventor · Enschede, NL

Thomas Terwee

18Patents
9h-index
10Co-inventors
69Inventor score

Filing activity: Jan 16, 1976 → Nov 5, 2012

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US7871437B2 Accommodating intraocular lenses and associated systems, frames, and methods Human Necessities 76 Active
US6598606B2 Methods of implanting an intraocular lens Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 68 Expired
US7182780B2 Device for use in eye surgery Human Necessities 48 Expired
US8182531B2 Accommodating intraocular lenses and associated systems, frames, and methods Human Necessities 42 Active
US8496701B2 Accommodating intraocular lenses and associated systems, frames, and methods Human Necessities 42 Active
US7582113B2 Method in eye surgery Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 21 Active
US6013029A Monitoring the concentration of a substance or a group of substances in a body fluid Human Necessities 12 Expired
US8945213B2 Device for use in eye surgery Human Necessities 11 Active
US7160324B2 Method in eye surgery Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 9 Expired
US7156101B2 Methods of implanting an intraocular lens Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 7 Expired
US4395871A Process for the manufacture of twistless or substantially twistless yarn and the yarn obtained according to this process Textiles; Paper 6 Expired
US4051658A Method of manufacturing twistless yarn and yarn made by this method Textiles; Paper 3 Expired
US4228643A Method for the manufacture of twistless or substantially twistless yarn Textiles; Paper 2 Expired
US7981154B2 Ophthalmic surgical method Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active
US8734463B2 Method of implanting an intraocular lens Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active
US7794697B2 Enhancement of lens regeneration using materials comprising polysiloxane polymers Human Necessities 0 Active
US8900299B2 Method in eye surgery Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active
US8303654B2 Device for use in eye surgery Human Necessities 0 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.