Inventor · Claymont, DE, US

Michael Dauner

14Patents
4h-index
26Co-inventors
56Inventor score

Filing activity: Feb 26, 2005 → Dec 12, 2016

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US8871488B2 Recombinant host cells comprising phosphoketolases Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 35 Active
US8697404B2 Enzymatic production of alcohol esters for recovery of diols produced by fermentation Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 19 Active
US9181566B2 Genetic switches for butanol production Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 10 Active
US9012190B2 Use of thiamine and nicotine adenine dinucleotide for butanol production Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 7 Active
US9771602B2 Competitive growth and/or production advantage for butanologen microorganism Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 3 Active
US9944954B2 Glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase for butanol production Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 1 Active
US7585617B2 Method and device for thermal conditioning of a cell Chemistry; Metallurgy 1 Expired
US9441250B2 Glycerol 3- phosphate dehydrogenase for butanol production Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 1 Active
US9005940B2 Down-regulation of a polynucleotide encoding a Sou2 sorbitol utilization protein to modify lipid production in microbial cells Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 1 Active
US9701989B2 Recombinant microbial cells that produce at least 28% eicosapentaenoic acid as dry cell weight Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active
US9550999B2 Recombinant host cells comprising phosphoketolases Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active
US10006058B2 Recombinant host cells comprising phosphoketalase Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active
US8734731B2 Apparatus and method for fractionating liquids charged with particles Physics 0 Active
US9441209B2 Down-regulation of a polynucleotide encoding a Sou2 sorbitol utilization protein to modify lipid production in microbial cells Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.