Inventor · Austin, TX, US

Michael Karasick

18Patents
9h-index
30Co-inventors
72Inventor score

Filing activity: Aug 11, 1994 → Apr 30, 2018

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US6456740B1 System and method for identifying form type in a handwriting recognition based form completion system Physics 77 Expired
US6182281A Incremental compilation of C++ programs Physics 44 Expired
US7051032B2 System and method for providing post HOC access to legacy applications and data Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 39 Expired
US6457172B1 Compiler for supporting multiple runtime data representations Physics 36 Expired
US7103844B2 Portal/portlet application data synchronization Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 33 Expired
US6219834A Extensible compiler and method Physics 17 Expired
US5488692A System and method for representing and manipulating three-dimensional objects on massively parallel architectures Physics 17 Expired
US5864700A Sequencing and error detection of template instantiations during compilation of C++ Programs Physics 16 Expired
US8010423B2 Anticipatory mobile system service brokering and resource planning from multiple providers Physics 15 Active
US9904983B2 Lens distortion correction using a neurosynaptic circuit Physics 6 Active
US10043248B2 Lens distortion correction using a neurosynaptic system Physics 4 Active
US10043241B2 Lens distortion correction using a neurosynaptic circuit Physics 4 Active
US8488150B2 Method and apparatus for analyzing usage of printers Physics 1 Active
US10169844B2 Lens distortion correction using a neurosynaptic circuit Physics 1 Active
US10157453B2 Lens distortion correction using a neurosynaptic circuit Physics 0 Active
US8488176B2 Method for analyzing usage of printers Physics 0 Active
US9672593B2 Lens distortion correction using a neurosynaptic system Physics 0 Active
US7778964B2 System and method for providing post HOC access to legacy applications and data Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.