David Chafin
18Patents
4h-index
23Co-inventors
56Inventor score
Filing activity: Oct 29, 2007 → Mar 13, 2023
Most-cited inventions
| Patent | Title | Area | Cited by | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US11663717B2 | Methods, systems, and apparatuses for quantitative analysis of heterogeneous biomarker distribution | Physics | 12 | Active |
| US10267769B2 | Processing system for processing specimens using acoustic energy | Physics | 8 | Active |
| US10126216B2 | Method for tissue sample fixation | Physics | 7 | Active |
| US10539487B2 | Systems and methods for monitoring tissue sample processing | Physics | 4 | Active |
| US8303915B2 | Thin film apparatus and method | Physics | 3 | Active |
| US10664967B2 | Methods, systems, and apparatuses for quantitative analysis of heterogeneous biomarker distribution | Physics | 3 | Active |
| US11181506B2 | Standardizing diffusion of a fluid into tissue | Physics | 3 | Active |
| US10712250B2 | Diffusion monitoring protocol for optimized tissue fixation | Physics | 2 | Active |
| US11624684B2 | Method for tissue sample fixation | Physics | 2 | Active |
| US11639886B2 | Diffusion monitoring protocol for optimized tissue fixation | Physics | 1 | Active |
| US11614426B2 | Processing system for processing specimens using acoustic energy | Physics | 1 | Active |
| US12216089B2 | Processing system for processing specimens using acoustic energy | Physics | 1 | Active |
| US12181387B2 | System and method for sample preservation | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US11635355B2 | System and method for sample processing | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US11959840B2 | Systems and methods for monitoring tissue sample processing | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US11049247B2 | Methods, systems, and apparatuses for quantitative analysis of heterogeneous biomarker distribution | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US12158401B2 | Method for tissue sample fixation | Physics | 0 | Active |
| US12360079B2 | Standardizing diffusion of a fluid into tissue | Physics | 0 | Active |
Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.