Inventor · Minnetonka, MN, US

John E. Cadotte

15Patents
13h-index
12Co-inventors
75Inventor score

Filing activity: Jan 16, 1975 → May 15, 2024

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US4277344A Interfacially synthesized reverse osmosis membrane Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 312 Expired
US4259183A Reverse osmosis membrane Chemistry; Metallurgy 96 Expired
US4039440A Reverse osmosis membrane Performing Operations; Transporting 81 Expired
US4765897A Polyamide membranes useful for water softening Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 72 Expired
US4888116A Method of improving membrane properties via reaction of diazonium compounds or precursors Performing Operations; Transporting 55 Expired
US5658460A Use of inorganic ammonium cation salts to maintain the flux and salt rejection characteristics of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes during drying Performing Operations; Transporting 48 Expired
US4812270A Novel water softening membranes Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 40 Expired
US4960517A Treatment of composite polyamide membranes via substitution with amine reactive reagents Performing Operations; Transporting 40 Expired
US4964998A Use of treated composite polyamide membranes to separate concentrated solute Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 35 Expired
US4824574A Novel water softening process using membranes Performing Operations; Transporting 29 Expired
US4812238A Membranes prepared via reaction of diazonium compounds or precursors Performing Operations; Transporting 28 Expired
US4895661A Alkali resistant hyperfiltration membrane Chemistry; Metallurgy 16 Expired
US4960518A Treatment of composite polyamide membranes with compatible oxidants Performing Operations; Transporting 15 Expired
US4834886A Process for making alkali resistant hyperfiltration membrane and resulting product Chemistry; Metallurgy 7 Expired
US12313346B1 Direct-contact heat exchange thermal energy storage system Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 0 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.