Inventor · Arlington, MA, US

Jakub Rybczynski

15Patents
6h-index
20Co-inventors
62Inventor score

Filing activity: Apr 10, 2006 → Dec 21, 2021

Most-cited inventions

PatentTitleAreaCited byStatus
US7649665B2 Apparatus and methods for optical switching using nanoscale optics Physics 47 Active
US7589880B2 Apparatus and methods for manipulating light using nanoscale cometal structures Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 40 Active
US7754964B2 Apparatus and methods for solar energy conversion using nanocoax structures Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 22 Active
US7943847B2 Apparatus and methods for solar energy conversion using nanoscale cometal structures Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 21 Active
US7634162B2 Apparatus and methods for nanolithography using nanoscale optics Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 17 Active
US8861170B2 Electrostatic chuck with photo-patternable soft protrusion contact surface Electricity 6 Active
US10497598B2 Electrostatic chuck and method of making same Electricity 3 Active
US8431816B2 Apparatus and methods for solar energy conversion using nanoscale cometal structures Emerging Cross-Sectional Technologies 2 Active
US9721821B2 Electrostatic chuck with photo-patternable soft protrusion contact surface Electricity 2 Active
US11309207B2 Grounding mechanism for multi-layer for electrostatic chuck, and related methods Electricity 1 Active
US11837492B2 Electrostatic chuck having a gas flow feature, and related methods Electricity 1 Active
US11612972B2 Electrostatic chuck with embossments that comprise diamond-like carbon and deposited silicon-based material, and related methods Performing Operations; Transporting 0 Active
US11742781B2 Electrostatic chuck with charge dissipation coating Electricity 0 Active
US12322634B2 Electrostatic chuck prepared by additive manufacturing, and related methods and structures Electricity 0 Active
US11417557B2 Spiraling polyphase electrodes for electrostatic chuck Electricity 0 Active

Source: USPTO / EPO open patent data. Inventor disambiguation is heuristic; counts are objective bibliographic measures.